a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: The reaction must be nuclear in some form, even if it is not fusion. >
If you claim it is nuclear reaction of type A and it turns out to be B instead, that puts your patent in jeopardy. Since you cannot patent a theory, there is no point to mentioning one at all. That is according to David French. Rossi says he has a theory, so you are wrong. > I know he has a theory, but I believe it keeps changing, and the theorists tell me it has no merit. - Jed
