A.ashfield please check my thread "customer warehouse" for simplified physics models of energy dumping and what all the energy would do to that warehouse. I used the real dimension of the warehouse the "customer" used and filled it full of water. In 16 days the water would boil.
I filled with ice and it takes 12 days to melt the entire building if it was a huge cube of ice, 3000 K tons of it. You will need 30 times this amount for an entire year assuming you could flush the water and fill the room again in zero time. I will come up with other type of physical processes and chemical reactions in the next few days and we can see how many tons of chemicals you will need. So far these back of the envelope calculations show how ridiculous Rossi's statements are. Giovanni On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 11:09 PM, a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry, you should read what Rossi actually said before making a statement > like that. Rossi said that the customer's process was endothermic and the > excess heat beyond that was vented. He didn't add how much was by air or > radiation and how much through cooling water going to the drain. > > > On 8/14/2016 8:34 PM, Giovanni Santostasi wrote: > > Daniel, > The main discussion we had in the last few days was about where the heat > is dumped. This is basic thermodynamics not sophisticated arguments about > Coulomb barrier shielding and so on. > Rossi claiming that the energy was used by chemical reactions and > therefore this why it didn't leave a thermal signature is bs. > Plain bs. No field of expertise needed. > > > > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> What field of expertise? This kind of argument is also used to "show" >> that cold fusion is bullshit. >> >> 2016-08-14 19:35 GMT-03:00 Giovanni Santostasi <[email protected]>: >> >>> I have a PhD in Physics so I understand the basics of energy, >>> >> > >
