There seems to be a pattern developing in the LENR body politic. The systems integrator discredits the LENR inventor using the same flow meter gambit. Then the systems integrator takes advantage of the IP of the defunct inventor to advance their business prospects.
Jeb seems to support without exception the systems integrator using info provided by the systems integrator involving the flow meter. The IP of the inventor eventually shows up in a patent that the systems integrator has a commercial interest in. On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > I posted the following; let's see if it stays or vanishes. > > > You asked me several times to describe what error Rossi made with the flow > meter. The error was described in detail in Exhibit 5 from I.H., which is > here: > > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6qvuFUMAp9HMEQyeHZlX256U1E > > I summarized the problems here: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg111082.html > >
