"Itwasclever on Rossi’s part, but the type of cleaverthat can cost him
dearly, in the end."
Your bias is showing again. Goatguy suggested a possible method to scam
the results and then you take it as read that that was done. Really?
It would have been easier to fudge the sensors or the instrumentation
reading them. That does not mean that was what happened either.
On 7/3/2016 10:45 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
RE: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit
*From:*Jed Rothwell
Someone pointed out to me that at such low temperatures, you would
probably use the hot fluid to heat the equipment directly before
returning it, rather than going through a heat exchanger.
- Jed
Didn’tyou see the post on NBFfrom GoatGuy -which nails the easy way
tocheatwiththis type of setup?It’s all aboutlettingair in theline,in
the “hidden room” where IHwas not permitted toeven take a look.This is
not accidental airleakage, but planned that way– todeceive.Of
course,GaotGuy’sexplanationdoesn’t work if you have a real customer
buyingrealsteam, since they immediately know they are getting
shortchanged.
That is why this case willlikelybe dismissedbefore it ever gets to
trial.Whentheswindleofclaiming for months that“the customer"isbuying
a$1000 per day of steam,isshown to bea make-believe customerwith no
use for steamat all(instead itisyour own business partnerwho isbuying
nothing)… when thisfraudis brought to the attention of the Court,
theclaim against IHwilllikelybe tossed.
Goat guy, whoseems to havean excellentgrasp of thissituation,came up
withthe explanation--whichcan be seen here by scrolling down to his
post in the comments.
_http://nextbigfuture.com/2016/04/rossi-1-megawatt-energy-catalyzer-is.html_
Basically,in the center of the “reactor shelter” is a box labeled
“water reservoir” which has 2 inlets and 2 outlets.
Inlet 1, top = tap water from municipal line
Inlet 2, bot = return from steam condensers
Outlet 1, top = water to first half of E-cats and then to water tank 1
Outlet 2, bot = water to second half of E-cats and then to water tank 2
All that would be needed would be for the steam-condenserloop to havea
planned amount ofair in the line for this to be a really misleading
COP > 1 system. Sensors that measure gas flow cannot discriminate 100%
steam from 50:50 steam from 0% hot air. Likewise, with a bit of
flim-flam, most of the heat emitted could be combined back into the
circulating loop (of which there are 2: (water tank 1) → (input to
ECat₁) → (combine with reservoir tank water) → (back into ECat₁) →
(back to water tank 1) … repeated for the bottom half…. Etc.Etc. An
ingenious scam.
Itwasclever on Rossi’s part, but the type of cleaverthat can cost him
dearly, in the end.
