Jed. But the real reason was because others replicated them
AA. The real problem was because early flubbed attempts to replicate
them failed. Plus it was not understood how it could be possible.
Jed. Since all other methods showed no excess heat, it was necessary
to measure the dissipation.
AA. That would be all that's need if it were true. You have no proof
of that, that you are willing to share, and the report of the
independent ERV disagrees with that. That is why the court case is
necessary.
On 6/4/2016 5:14 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
AA. Oh yes? Fleischmann and Pons produced excess heat and that is
not acknowledged to this very day.
They persuaded hundreds of scientists within a year. Granted they had
credibility. But the real reason was because others replicated them.
No one has replicated Rossi as far as I know. Some may have. Or maybe
they replicated Mills.
AA. How many times do I have to repeat it? It should NOT be
necessary to see where the generated heat is dissipated in order
to measure the output of the 1 MW plant.
Since all other methods showed no excess heat, it was necessary to
measure the dissipation.
Plus, as I said, no one would write a check for $89 million without
checking this.
Would you hand over $89 million if your measurements showed no excess
heat and Rossi would not let you into the customer site? Would you
REALLY, REALLY do that, based on a contract written a year before?
The ERV was the independent judge and you ignore him.
If the data I have seen comes from the ERV, then I have not ignored
him. The ERV is Rossi's puppet, and he is very, very stupid.
- Jed
