On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:21 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson <
[email protected]> wrote:

I think we came to loggerheads over the whole McKubre M4 issue. I never
> felt comfortable with Krivit's analysis (actually, I would say: Krivit's
> opinion) on the matter.


I found Steven Krivit's supporting material relating to the changes in
Michael McKubre's M4 graph very interesting.  It was Krivit's thesis that
was silly.  He wanted to make it out as though McKubre had done something
unsavory.  What was clear from the changes over the years was
that McKubre was revisiting earlier interpretations and presentations of
the data, in a way that seemed to me to be quite appropriate.

Eric

Reply via email to