Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> wrote: > No Jed I do not know the results. > The results are quoted by Rossi right here in the interview! What do you mean you do not know them? You can't read?
Daniel Rocha did the analysis of the numbers from the interview. He showed the temperature is just above 100°C. The data sample provided by Rossi to Lewan, to me and to others shows exactly the same thing, except the numbers are listed directly, without extrapolation. The temperature is listed at just over boiling. Actually it is just below boiling, given the pressure and other factors. I know not to spout firm controversial judgment. > What could possibly be controversial about the boiling point of water for crying out loud!? I am sure you know. I am less sure of you judgment, based on your vague bak > up of your statements > What was vague about Rossi's adamant refusal to allow people to see the customer equipment? What do you find vague about that what possible justification can you think of for it. This is not vague. This is the clearest evidence imaginable, in words directly from Rossi himself, showing that he was engaged in fraud. There is no other plausible explanation. Or if there is, you have not provided it and neither has he. This has nothing to do with me. This is now based entirely on what Rossi himself said in the interview. If you cannot see that you are incapable of elementary analyses and you do not even understand the boiling point of water. - Jed
