Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> wrote: Jed, just one reason one proof is more reliable than another. > Because you believe? > No, because the data shows it.
> If IH is in control they would come free . . . > I.H. is not in control. As Rossi said in the Lewan interview, the I.H. expert insisted he must see the customer machinery, but Rossi refused. My data comes from Rossi. His instruments. Not from I.H. The numbers I have are the same as the ones quoted by Rossi in the Lewan interview. What he does not say is that he screwed up the analysis, the configuration and choice of instruments, and that every expert who has looked at the data concluded there is no excess heat. Plus every non-expert such as me. - Jed
