If there is no "excess heat" but still something useful like the conversion of heat into electricity or light, Industrial Heat will have to undergo a name change. Maybe Industrial Light and Magic? ;-)
Harry On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: > Too unclear and this has allowed Krivit to publish his variant of the story- > IH- Rossi divorce. > > Peter > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Craig Haynie <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Reading between the lines... Does it sound like they're preparing us for >>> a negative report on Rossi's one year test? >> >> >> It does sound that way. >> >> The statement is oblique, but clearly it is intended to reduce excitement >> and dial back people's expectations. >> >> I think the statement also clearly says: "if you do not hear something >> from us, don't believe it." It says that here: >> >> "That’s why any claims made about technologies in our portfolio should >> only be relied upon if affirmed by Industrial Heat . . ." >> >> >> In other words, Rossi does not speak for Industrial Heat. I.H. does not >> affirm Rossi's statements on his blog. It probably also means that if Rossi >> issues a report which has not been cleared by I.H. and published by them, >> they do not affirm it. Meaning endorse it. >> >> The statement is unclear but I think that part is clear. >> >> - Jed >> > > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
