Axil--
I agree with your idea about the magnetic field creating “forward” anisotropy. The strength of the magnetic field (Including those associated with SPP’s) also changes the spin energy states for the electrons in the lattice and the nuclear magnetic energy states, thus changing the allowed transitions between nuclear energy states. The anisotropy of the alignment may also create more of a one-dimension thermal motion. Certain temperatures may be all it takes to bring nucleons of the lattice close enough to react. Anharmonic conditions associated with non-symmetric lattice geometry may be the straw that breaks the coulomb barrier that is so sacred to many. The anharmonicity provides the wherewithal for a control mechanism to work. I think this may be consistent with the recent Ukrainian breather model for LENR. It may be applicable to any lattice with high magnetic susceptibility. The ability to change the direction and intensity of the induced magnetic field is the controlling mechanism. Lasers with their intense varying electric and magnetic fields may be such a control mechanism, one which adds the flexibility of a changing electric field too and at specific resonant frequencies associated with anharmonic local lattice parameters. If quadrapole vaying fields are handy, a pair of lasers may be all that is required. Cravin and Letts may be able to shed some light on this. Bob Cook Sent from Windows Mail From: Axil Axil Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 7:37 PM To: [email protected] IMHO, it is the crystal structure of the material that makes a molecule LENR active, That structure and placement of the atoms in the crystal formats the spin of the material to project forward anisotropy to concentrate and organize the spin in a concentrated direction...forward. SmCo is an anisotropic magnetic material. The magnetic beam energy is concentrated in a preferred direction. Calculation of magnetic anisotropy energy in SmCo5 http://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0303368.pdf On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Cobalt is also a Mills (Rydberg) catalyst with IP “holes” complementary to > nickel and iron. A most interesting catalyst mix for exploiting > ferromagnetism would be Ni, SmCo5, Fe2O3 and potassium. There could be 8 > distinct Rydberg multiples available. > > > > From: Axil Axil > > SmCo5 has the magic hexagonal crystal structure of active LENR promoters > like metalize hydrogen. The Sm rare earth configures the Co atoms to take on > the hexagonal configuration which directs all the magnetic spins along the Z > axis. > > > > Was there a secret magnetic preparation process involved in the production > of LENR active SmCo5? If so I will know what it was. > > > > Russ George wrote: > > I had the privilege of standing in the parking lot of the hotel where > Chukanov had his demo running for several hours in the company of Martin > Fleischmann fusing some of our little grey cells over that device. Chukanov > answered or at least responded to every single question we posed to him and > we sent many his way. It was a fascinating and captivating demo. Martin was > the kind of man who had insatiable curiosity and not a mean molecule in his > body and showed it in his sincere interest and professorial manner. Chukanov > sent us both away with several large chunks of his metal. > > Meanwhile the hundreds of ICCF conference attendees almost entirely shunned > the ‘parking lot demo’ and Chukanov, especially the self-appointed high > priest insiders of cold fusion. There was little but derision and snide > attacks behind Chukanov’s back at the meeting. > > After a couple hours in hot afternoon sun with Chukanov and his machine > Martin and I adjorned to the beach and floated for a long time like basking > whales chatting about this and that. > > Somewhere in my collection of ‘cold fusion’ holy treasures I have some of > Chukanov’s SmCo5 metal. I think I will dig it out and see if some of the > recent ‘activation’ ideas make it work even better! > > From: Jones Beene > > Aha – so that’s where Dennis Cravens probably got the idea to use SmCo in > his famous NI Week Demo. Notably, samarium has a high percentage of > radioactive isotopes which could be activate by fractional hydrogen. > > From: Russ George > > What about the demo of Chukanov at the ICCF meeting in Hawaii many years > ago. In large cylinders crushed and powdered SmCo5, magnetic metal, was > cycled with hydrogen loading and deloading and produced kilowatts of > apparent excess heat! > > From: Jones Beene > > … but wait, there’s more… (best Billy Mays’ tin cup plea) > > In another experiment you may not have heard of - from Bockris and > Sundaresan in 1994 - it was shown that magnetic stimulation boosted excess > heat substantially in a Pd-D electrolysis cell. This line of work leads up > to the Letts-Cravens effect – wrt understanding the influence of a magnetic > field on LENR. > > “After the cathode had been charged with deuterium for 48 hours at a current > of 80 mA, the cell was placed in the field of a permanent magnet of 200 > Gauss strength. The cell electrolyte temperature rose to 5°C above ambient > after 230 seconds. After 576 seconds, the magnet was replaced by two > Neodymium magnets with a 800 Gauss field. The temperature immediately > started increasing and reached 13.5 °C above ambient in about 15 minutes and > remained constant. The temperature returned when the magnet was removed… > [end of Bockris quote] > > The $64 question - why isn’t a magnetic field fully employed in the > glow-stick experiments? By “fully employed” it is meant that: yes, the > heater wire does provide a minimal field but increasing the field strength > by an order of magnitude could be beneficial. > > … relevant comment: those who do not remember the past cannot benefit from > its insight- paraphrase of famous Santayana quote, which is the logic > behind the LENR-CANR library. > > ____________________________________________ > >
