Like Russ George (see below), I see no connection between our CMNS field and gravity waves.
Ludwik ================================= On Feb 11, 2016, at 9:26 PM, Giovanni Santostasi wrote: > It opens a complete different window on the Universe. > The analogy that is often given is imagine the cosmic show is like a TV show. > Until now we had video but not audio. Finally we turned the audio on. > Gravitational waves are a different but complementary way to observe the > universe. > We already learning things we could not learn before just using EM radiation. > For example that there are black holes systems with such large masses. > This has consequences in terms of galaxy evolution and how stars were formed. > And this is just the beginning. > The ultimate price is when we will see the gravitational waves from Big Bang. > While the Microwave Cosmic Background tell us abut the universe at a very > early stage (500 K years) we cannot receive any earlier information about the > universe using EM radiation. > The equivalent gravitational wave background when detected will tells > information from a fraction of a second after the Big Bang. Only > gravitational radiation can give us a picture of the universe that early. > > Also information from events like the one just observed eventually would give > us clues on how gravity and quantum mechanics work together. > The consequences of this discovery are enormous. > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Russ George <[email protected]> wrote: > It seems the announcement of showing gravity waves are real is only of value > to obscure academic discussions. Unless someone here might illuminate us > about some practical derivatives that might be revealed due to the findings. > >
