Tachyons explain were the K-mesons are coming from in the Holmlid experiment.
See Plasma-Balls in Large N Gauge Theories and Localized Black Holes http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0507219v3.pdf On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > My quest for truth goes where the dots take me. > > String theory predicts many of the strange results that we are seeing, but > these theorists believe that the applications of these theories are only > cosmological. > A major tenant of string theory is the tachyon. There has been > photographic evidence of this sort of particle track observed in LENR > experimentation for many years. Recently, the chief scientist at AIRBUS > released a paper on this subject and this area or research is big in Russia. > > It is possible to estimate the energy content of these monopole tachyons > together with their kinetic energy content using photographic emulsions by > placing the ash from the recent LENR experiment on the photographic > emulsions and wait for a 24 hour exposure. > I believe what we are seeing are tachyons. Here is a site that documents > the LENR research in this area and I hope that our research includes a > search for particle tracks on photographic emulsions. > > For exotic particle approach to LENR theory, see for theory and > experimental results as follows: > > http://restframe.com/rf/home.html > > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> *From:* Axil Axil >> >> Ø …The following article explains way rotating light is important >> in explaining the various miracles associated with LENR. This also takes us >> up to and beyond the cutting edge of science and string theory…. Prof. >> Daniele Faccio: "Black Holes, With A Twist" - Inaugural Lecture >> >> Few observers have a problem with black holes on a cosmological scale. >> However, even the smallest possible black hole provides absolutely no >> insight for understanding LENR - and in fact, using the term simply >> provide the skeptic with another place to hang a hat. It is a crank >> notion. >> >> Sure, there is a tiny minimum mass for black holes to exist, so they do >> not have to be only cosmological - but that minimum mass is known, and >> it is much higher than anything seen in real experiments – such as the >> Holmlid effect. In principle, the smallest possible black hole will have >> a minimum mass equal to or above the Planck mass. That is indeed small on >> the scale where we usually encounter black holes. >> >> However, the Planck mass is calculated to about 22 micrograms – which is >> about 10^19 hydrogen atoms. That is the smallest possible size. The >> energy necessary to produce such a nano black hole is 39 orders of >> magnitude greater than the total energy available from the LHC, >> indicating that even the Large Hadron Collider cannot produce mini black >> holes… and obviously they have no bearing on the identity of SPP. >> >> Therefore, IMHO - it is rather silly to throw out a term which cannot be >> justified in theory or in experiment, especially when it adds nothing >> intuitive. As I said, this term merely reinforces the notion among some >> physicists that the LENR community is grasping at straws to explain >> results. >> >> Jones Beene wrote: >> >> A key paper for those who subscribe to the SPP modality in LENR – which >> is operational in at least one form (the Holmlid effect) is: “Plasmonics >> with a Twist: Taming Optical Tornadoes on the Nanoscale” by Svetlana V. >> Boriskina (MIT). >> >> *http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.1657* <http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.1657> >> >> Boriskina provides insight into the plasmonic focusing mechanism – which >> is necessary to focus wavelengths of visible coherent light (in the range >> of green to yellow, or 535 nm to 580 nm) down to approximately 1 nm and >> below. She explains this by invoking an analogy of the 'photon fluid' (and >> magneto hydrodynamics) where light waves will be locally amplified and >> upshifted via convective vortex acceleration. The result is like an eddy >> current of photons up to a million time more powerful than before. >> >> Thus, the Holmlid effect is explained by trapped light which is swirled >> into optical vortices by EM fields. These are transitory tornado-like areas >> of circular/helical motion of flux. The result is magnetic fields of >> extreme local intensity (kilo-Tesla to mega-T.) which effectively compress >> and densify hydrogen into a new phase which can be well beyond metallic. >> Metallic hydrogen required compressive forces in the range of 500 GPa, but >> dense hydrogen requires at least an order of magnitude more force, which is >> well beyond the mechanical strength of a diamond anvil, for instance. The >> payoff is Holmlid’s new phase of dense hydrogen which becomes stable, once >> formed, without added pressure. Metallic hydrogen is not stable in an >> unpressurized condition and immediately reverts to the gas. >> >> The specific resonance values for the vortex formation depend on the >> matrix metal. With Holmlid’s experiments using iron-oxide matrix, the >> resonance value for photons is 535 nm which is green light. For palladium, >> using PdCl and LiCl electrolyte the strongest emission line is 542 nm which >> is yellow green. Electrolysis creates its own internal photons at the >> emission lines of the electrolyte. >> >> BTW – Boriskina apparently has no present connection to LENR per se, but >> as a theorist, she could become more important to the field than almost any >> other theorist (including Hagelstein) – to the extent that the SPP modality >> is shown to be correct. She appears to be relatively young which is bonus, >> should her insight prevail - since LERN field is aging rapidly. >> >> *http://www.bio-page.org/boriskina/* <http://www.bio-page.org/boriskina/> >> >> >
