Ahhh....the famous Edison light bulb scam: Light cannot be created without something being burned! Grins, Ron Kita, Chiralex
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm permalink didn't work, but here it is: > > Alain Coetmeur 4 hours ago > > EmDrive phenomenon is still uncertain, and may well be an unimagined > artifact. Unimagined because until now, no artifact was able toe explain > the result, and EmDrive phenomenon was replicated. > > Ethan Siegel, as usual give priority to theory facing evidences. > > On E-cat I can, only laugh at his misinformation. The same way, he reject > evidences only from theory, despite a much more serious list of > experimental evidences, he reject not only E-cat but also LENR aka cold > fusion. > > E-cat reality, I concede, is mostly supported by business evidence, like > Tom darden commitment, 50M$ investment by Woodford fund, Fortune article > interviewing Tom darden and even strange name-dropping of Time magazine > with “Industrial Heat” Experimental evidence of E-cat are mostly loose, and > the only serious experimental evidence, the calorimetry of Ferrara test, > the melting in Ferrara, and Lugano test isotopic shift, are hidden by smoke > screen of false informations and conspiracy theories. The bad job or Rossi > until Ferrara, and then on the Swedish physicists prevented better evidence > to be clear. Anyway, people doing, like Woodford fund, their due diligence > can acquire solid evidence. Since Woodford fund is very famous in UK, many > other actors are looking at it. > > However LENR, despite the pathological consensus, is beyond the reasonable > doubt. > > There is hundreds of peer reviewed papers that are produced by many > scientists, from various scientists in many countries, in many recognized > organizations. The consensus denying LENr reality is no less than a > groupthink, a collective denial. > > Lawrence Forsley just published on Academia.edu a document listing the > best papers presenting, among others, the numerous replications of US Navy > Spawar co-deposition LENR experiment. There is much more, and all is denied > without any rational reason. > > This is why no less than Airbus Chief scientist is now supporting LENR > startups (like LENR-Cities), and organizing LENr Workshop in Airbus resort > (Toulouse). > > Instead of parroting theory justified denial, I would appreciate Forbes > reports Woodford fund investment, Airbus Innovations movements, Tohoku > University LENR lab newly created with MHI and CleanPlanet, Baishishan > technology park welcoming Tom darden E-cat technology, and maybe more that > some journalist present in LENRG-Oxborf, LENRG-Milan, LENRG-Neuchatel, > should have reported. > > Ethan Siegel is very good in explaining theory, and showing how evidence > match the theory. > > With evidence that don’t match the theory, I think he is clearly out of > his domain of competence. > > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:56 AM, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Brilliant smackdown: >> http://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2015/11/08/the-em-drive-nasas-impossible-engine-highlights-our-greatest-failing/?commentId=comment_blogAndPostId/blog/comment/4033-120-22 >> >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> What's particularly arrogant is he says "respect scientists" but then >>> he's denigrating all of the extremely well educated and talented scientists >>> that actually believe in cold fusion. >>> >>> I think Ethan is having a nervous breakdown. >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:41 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> It's just click bait. Move on. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The usual ranting of Ethan Siegel against anomalies that don't respect >>>>> theory. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2015/11/08/the-em-drive-nasas-impossible-engine-highlights-our-greatest-failing/ >>>>> >>>>> one day we will have to tell him what is science. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
