No matter where the experiment is performed, neutrinos are not a stimulant or a causation of of muon production: light is.
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > *From:* Axil Axil > > Ø Holmlid states that muons are detected even when stimulated by > the fluorescent lights from his lab excites the catalyst. No muons are > produced in the dark. > > Are you implying that a deep mine is usually dark so the test of Mauro’s > hypothesis would not work in a mine? > > The original suggestion assumes that a mobile “standardized Holmlid > experiment” will be driven by a laser. If you have laser light available, > anything else, like a fluorescent, is superfluous. > > Heck if helps, one can also take a fluorescent down there too J > > --------------------- > > Perhaps neutrinos are indeed captured in very dense Rydberg matter (which > is essentially metallic hydrogen). I think the hypothesis could be tested > this way. First arrange a standardized Holmlid experiment with dense > hydrogen but make it mobile - then transport the same experiment to deep > mine underground, then as a third test, transport the same experiment to a > nuclear reactor facility and run it as close to the reactor as is safe. > > If the hypothesis of neutrino capture is sound, the muon rate will go down > in the deep mine, since the neutrino flux is less, and it will go up near > the nuclear reactor, compared to the normal results, since the flux is much > higher there. > > > >
