All, *Why has muon catalysed fusion not been successful in the past, and how does Star Scientific plan to overcome this?* People have been producing nuclear fusion reactions from muon catalysed fusion for decades – they just haven’t been able to do it consistently, or in sufficient volumes for it to be considered a viable energy source.
Star Scientific is developing a method to efficiently and consistently produce pions, and hence muons economically – and these muons are the catalyst for fusion energy. *How will Star Scientific overcome the “alpha sticking problem” which has caused many scientists to abandon research into muon catalysed fusion?* The ‘alpha sticking problem’ refers to the concern that during the muon catalysed reaction, some muons – about 1% to 2% – bond with the by-products instead of catalysing. This reduces the number of muons available to liberate energy, and therefore the energy output. Star Scientific is perfecting a method to constantly produce pions, which immediately decay into muons, which means the natural loss of some muons during the reaction is of no consequence. *How has Star Scientific addressed the issue of energy input vs output in creating fusion energy?* Energy input versus output is an issue with plasma fusion, not muon catalysed fusion. Plasma fusion consumes 18 times more energy than it produces. The Star Scientific system requires very little energy to run, which means 99% of the energy liberated by the fusion reaction is available for use. *Has your muon catalysed fusion system been independently tested?* Our system has undergone, and continues to undergo, rigorous testing by our own team of scientists as well as leading, independent global experts from around the world. As long as our IP is protected, we have an open door policy where results measurement is concerned to ensure this technology can be officially evaluated and then shared with the world as soon as possible. There is also a Joint Japanese - UK effort involved with developing muon catalyzed fusion. Mark Mark Goldes Chairman, CEO, AESOP Energy LLC 707 861-9070 AESOP Institute website: www.aesopinstitute.org On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > *From:* Eric Walker > > > > Ø It's a source of concern that the evidence both for ultradense > deuterium and for the different branching fractions all go back to Holmlid. > > > > Yes, but he has worked with many respected collaborators, including Miley > and Winterberg. He has over 80 peer reviewed publications, which only goes > part of the way. > > > > Hopefully, we will see replication from an independent party soon. Holmlid > does not seem to be holding back any details – and he says that > off-the-shelf catalyst works. He has patent filings in place – so there is > less reason to try to deceive. > > > > Anyone got a muon detector handy? > > >
