Does the hydrogen and oxygen gas get released into the same region?   I did not 
see any reference to using DC with this device which is what separates the two 
gasses in normal systems.

One would think that an exact mixture of those two would be a deadly 
combination to handle.

Dave

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Wed, Sep 16, 2015 5:03 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Hydrogen Economy now feasible?


 
  
   
Jones Beene     <[email protected]> wrote:   
   
    
     
      
Hydrogen from solar - has the advantage of an infrastructure which is in place 
with half a billion automobiles – the engines of 100% of them can be converted 
to burn hydrogen. 
     
    
    
Do you mean retrofitted? I do not think so. Years ago there were attempts to do 
this in Japan at Osaka U. and elsewhere. They did not end well. There were 
leaks, explosions and corrosion.     
    
    
     
    
    
Many taxi cabs in Japan use LP gas, but the motors are designed for it. I 
expect that engines designed for hydrogen would be fine.     
    
    
     
    
    
The other problem is storing and fueling hydrogen in small scale installations. 
As I recall Osaka U. also made an advanced fueling station, which also 
exploded. That is not to suggest it cannot be done, but clearly More Research 
Is Needed.    
    
     
    
    
It would cost a lot of money to build tens thousands of fuel stations. You 
might have hydrogen generators at home as an alternative, but I think that 
would also be problematic.    
    
     
    
    
On the other hand, large-scale industrial installations and hydrogen pipelines 
have been in use since before World War II. Properly handled, hydrogen is no 
more dangerous than other explosive gases. I think that with some investment, 
hydrogen fueled automobiles and airplanes, and filling stations, could become 
as safe as gasoline ones. See Peter Hoffman, "Tomorrow's Energy" for details.   
 
    
     
    
    
If cold fusion can be made to work in a fully controlled reaction, I think it 
will be far safer than any chemical liquid fuel, or any other form of nuclear 
power. After an accident and shutdown there will be nothing to burn, and no way 
to continue the reaction.    
    
     
    
    
- Jed    
    
     
    
   
  
 
 

Reply via email to