http://phys.org/news/2013-06-simple-theory-dark.html
Read this for more background on anapole EMF concentration. On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > http://phys.org/news/2015-08-theory-radiationless-revolution.html > > Note: this point > > "The theory could have broad ranging applications from explaining dark > matter to combating energy losses in future technologies." > > If you want to get into how Dark mode solitons and plasmoids can produce > mass in EMF concentration. > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=2002MNRAS.333..360B&db_key=AST&page_ind=0&plate_select=NO&data_type=GIF&type=SCREEN_GIF&classic=YES >> >> Start out with the reference above and we will progress step by step to >> show that Rydberg matter will satisfy all experimental observations that >> connects LENR to dark matter. >> >> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> From Axil: >>> >>> >>> >>> > We know that Dark Matter is a result of Rydberg matter that >>> >>> > exists as a preferred form of hydrogen that is spread widely >>> >>> > throughout the universe. >>> >>> >>> >>> FWIW, it disturbs me to no end reading a Vort post that portrays >>> speculative assumptions (however tantalizing those assumptions may be to >>> some within the Collective) as undisputed fact. It's no different than >>> hearing another so called undisputed fact claiming that hydrinos make up >>> dark matter. One can get their fill of the hydrino model over at Dr. Mills' >>> SCP group. It is enthusiastically supported by the BLP cheer leading squad. >>> ((I suspect some of them were very happy to see me barred.) >>> >>> >>> >>> So which is it, Axil? Rydberg matter, or hydrinos? I suspect you'd have >>> a real fight on your hands if you decided to correct SCP's presumed >>> misconceptions about the explanation for Dark Matter. Quite frankly, I >>> don't know which model is the correct one, or perhaps I should say: The >>> more accurate one. Perhaps in the end it may turn out to be the case that >>> it's neither. >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm going to sit on the fence some more and see what shakes out. Sadly, >>> I think it's going to continue to be a long wait. Under the circumstance >>> the best thing for me to do is try not generate posts filled with >>> tantalizing speculation passed off as undisputed fact. Granted, that is >>> easier said than done at times. Nobody is perfect. >>> >>> >>> >>> Full disclosure: I admit my ignorance of the Rydberg matter model. Is >>> there a reasonably brief explanation of the model posted somewhere that I >>> might be able to read up on... hopefully an explanation that doesn't >>> involve 20 pages of Integrals? At present all I have to go on is the >>> suspicion that Hydrinos and Rydberg matter seem to be strongly related to >>> each other, as if they are kissing cousins. As in the case of hydrinos, >>> over the years I've acquired a vague impression that much of Rydberg matter >>> involves altered states of hydrogen. Is that a correct assumption, or am I >>> wrong on that? >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Steven Vincent Johnson >>> >>> OrionWorks.com >>> >>> zazzle.com/orionworks >>> >> >> >
