All nuclear reactions produce byproducts, many of which could be
public health hazards.

Mr. Wright now needs to make the case that for the sake of public
safety, the government should compel Rossi, Darden or Vaughn to
disclose the location of any US based LENR laboratory.

We have seen pictures of the hotcat that were taken somewhere... and
we know a device was delivered to Lugano. Evidence is high that Rossi
is tinkering with nuclear energy.

Keep digging, Mr. Wright! I want the truth.

- Brad



On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
<[email protected]> wrote:
> HmmmmMMMMM  careful james, I think you're starting to buy into this mass
> conspiracy thing.
>
> The government is EXTREMELY touchy about anything that could involve nuclear
> materials because of terrorism.   They probably said he wasn't credible
> because they wanted to explain why they weren't following up on  it further.
>
> Analog's view is interesting for sure, though I think he's fooling himself
> if he thinks that his perspective is anymore probable than the idea that
> Vaughn just got misquoted.
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:36 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Why would a government official word things in such in a way that is
>> obviously biased to serve the open agenda of the querent, "Gary Wright"?
>>
>> One Rossi-favorable interpretation is that this NC State official is
>> attempting to cover his ass with the Federal bureaucrats in charge of
>> nuclear matters who, the history of the physics establishment shows, clearly
>> share in Gary Wright's agenda?
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yeah, not a big deal when your partner says you have no credibility to a
>>>> government rep.
>>>
>>>
>>> He does not have credibility. No one disputes that. Why are you making
>>> such a big deal about it?
>>>
>>> I assume the statement was not only "paraphrased" but taken out of
>>> context. It was probably something like: "He does not have credibility with
>>> the scientific community, but we have reason to believe his claims are
>>> true."
>>>
>>> - Jed
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to