I mentioned this as an option, but the scheduling vendor didn't like the idea. I'm guessing they don't have a billing method for this. Right now it's on hold until he can get someone on his tech side involved. I was more just curious about his concept that he thinks they have done a split before. He may be completely mistaken.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 3:15 PM Matthew Duggan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi There, > > Twilio Gold Partner here. If they port the number to Twilio then using > Twilio Programmable Voice they calls could be forwarded either via sip or > pstn back to yourselves. > > They would have to pay Twilio the Egress cost. Feel free to message me > offline for further assistance. > > Best Regards, > > *Matthew Duggan | Head of DevOps* > *Mobile:* +447954163438 > *Phone:* +44 (0)345 8800 808 > *Email:* [email protected] > *Address:* Peter House, Oxford Street, Manchester M1 5AN, United Kingdom > > *www.ciptex.com* <http://ciptex.com/> > [image: Logo] <http://ciptex.com/> [image: linkedin icon] > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/ciptex/> [image: facebook icon] > <https://www.facebook.com/ciptex> [image: twitter icon] > <https://twitter.com/ciptex> [image: youtube icon] > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8puyBCaT5tomGyMcnlbmsA?reload=9> > [image: Banner] <http://ciptex.com/> > Legal: CAUTION - This message may contain privileged and confidential > information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you > are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that > any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message is > prohibited. If you have received this message in error please notify Ciptex > Ltd. immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the > individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Ciptex Ltd. > Ciptex Ltd - Registered Office: Chancery House, 30 St. Johns Road, Woking, > Surrey, GU21 7SA. Company Number: 05671321 > ------------------------------ > *From:* VoiceOps <[email protected]> on behalf of Jorge > Guntanis via VoiceOps <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 17, 2022 11:04:12 PM > *To:* Carlos Alvarez <[email protected]> > *Cc:* VoiceOps <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [VoiceOps] Splitting voice and SMS > > > CAUTION: This email may have originated from outside of the organization. > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and > know the content is safe. > > If they are already in twilio, they can create a SIP Trunk where you'd > connect to to get the inbound calls. > That way SMS stays at twilio and voice goes to you. > > I'm not aware of another way to do it cleanly. > > El mié, 17 de ago. de 2022 3:56 p. m., Carlos Alvarez via VoiceOps < > [email protected]> escribió: > > We had an odd customer request, via a vendor trying to provide them with > automated scheduling services via SMS. They are asking us to "release the > SSID" to allow them to do SMS on the number, but we keep the voice. I'm > unaware of this ability, and they even said that so far, most carriers > won't even discuss it with them. > > Their service rides on the Twilio API, and I *think* Twilio uses > Bandwidth. This number is currently with Bandwidth. So I don't know if > that might make a difference. > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops > >
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
