This is strictly my opinion but...

The best thing about VNC is it is free and source code is available 
if you feel the need to alter it.  It is also a fairly tight little program in 
regards to size and performance I think at last test it performed 
only second to Citrix.  It's leading competitor for remote access 
weighs in at a hefty 30+ Mb. VNC will fit and run off a floppy disk.  
You're right in my opinion that it needs a file transfer utility, but a 
number of us who use VNC in a large capacity also run it with 
OpenSSH which contains a utility called SCP.  If you're running 
SSH with VNC then you get the copy utility and you can run VNC 
securely across an encrypted channel.  You can get away also with 
installing a mini ftp server on your remote host and starting it up 
after you connect with VNC to transfer files also though you do not 
get the security benefits of SSH.  Of course I'm speaking here 
mostly about the Windows version since many of these limitations 
do not exist on the UNIX platforms.

VNC is not and does not try to be an end to end solution.  This may 
change as it evolves but currently I do not believe it seeks that 
capacity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line:
'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to