: Grant McDorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : The problem is that VNC, on *nix systems, will always use a display : number for access by applications. If one drops the display number : for the VNC client connections, then we'll have *two* unrelated IDs : for the VNC server - the display number, and the VNC ID, whatever that : might be (port perhaps?).
What, you don't like the -rfbport option of Xvnc? What's wrong with it? Needs to be uppercase or something? I agree that an unambiguous way to refer by port instead of by display number in a vncviewer would be nice; but it isn't all that unweildy now: if the number is over 100, it's a port. So again... just what do you propose should change, anyways? Or did you mean the WinDoze server? Wayne Throop [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line: 'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------
