>We already use RFB version 4.x in some of our projects. We're now developing
>version 5.0 of the protocol which is a substantial change from the version 3
>protocols. It would be good to coordinate over what version number you choose
>for your new protocol so that we don't release incompatible protocols which
>claim to be the same version number. That would be bad :-)
Strongly agree. I'm sticking to v3.x for my proposals documentation,
since I don't see any immediate reason to make substantially
incompatible changes. I gather the v3.x numberspace is open for this
kind of use, given that AT&T have already moved beyond this? I
suspect v3.x software will remain in use for some considerable time
to come...
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
from: Jonathan "Chromatix" Morton
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (not for attachments)
website: http://www.chromatix.uklinux.net/vnc/
geekcode: GCS$/E dpu(!) s:- a20 C+++ UL++ P L+++ E W+ N- o? K? w--- O-- M++$
V? PS PE- Y+ PGP++ t- 5- X- R !tv b++ DI+++ D G e+ h+ r++ y+(*)
tagline: The key to knowledge is not to rely on people to teach you it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
