Using Stunnel for the client side stuff has always worked
moderately well for me. It is the WinVNC server that didn't
work for nothing..
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Waugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: Happy ending..
> Hmmn, just the yesterday I set up STUNNEL on port 5801, redirected to 5800 -
> used a browser to connect to 5801 and everything went as fast as normal.
>
> (I actually have a feeling, though, that after making the initial connection
> to port 5801 and putting in the password, all the rest of the connection by
> the Java app is through port 5900 making my SSL for naught. I'll know better
> when I get back home.)
>
>
> On 31/05/2001 at 12:50 PM Michael F. March wrote:
>
> >Using Zebedee solved all my problems. Even over desperately slow
> >links, it works great.
> >
> >Thanks to everyone that emailed me..
> >
> >> Just to make sure that the Stunnel binary and WinVNC server were
> >> not acting weird together, I established the tunnel on another
> >> workstation in my house and had the WinVNC server connect through
> >> that.
>
> i
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list
> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
