I use them both and since they interoperate very well, it does
not seem to be a pain to have them both around.
On my Windows box, for instance, both versions of the client
share most of the same config and register settings so I can
pop back and forth between both versions with little hassle.
> Okay, I've seen many references to the two suites, but I'm looking for
> something more conclusive.
>
> I see that Tridia has more encoding options (adding compression), but AT&T
> VNC is ported to more platforms. Fine. But as my primary use is 100%
> "wintel" << yeah, yeah, *nix is much better, but I'm a corporate IT guy
> that has to support an infrastructure of wintel boxes---cut me some slack,
> OK ;-) >> and both suites exist for that platform, I'd *really* like to
> know why some of you have mixed installations. Basically, if you're using
> Tridia to get better WAN/dialup inet performance, why keep AT&T VNC around
> for the LAN side? What's to be gained by a mixed VNC infrastructure?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
