Angus Macleod writes:
>Concerning paranoia, I think that it is not only reasonable, but necessary
>to protect your home PC or network with some sort of firewall (or NAT
>server) if you are also one of those people who has an "always on"
>connection and who accesses their corporate network from home.
>I would agree that a hacker would not find very much of interest on the
>typical home PC, but might find it more entertaining to piggy back from
>there right past the corporate firewall and into the internal resources of
>where you work.
Interesting thought, I wonder if any corporations have enough sense to close
these potential holes? Is anyone compelling their employees to secure their
home machines which are accessing corporate VPNs?
Seth, who has just come back from watching "Antitrust" at the Cinema!
-------------------------------------------------------------
Seth Kneller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.12
GCS d- s: a20 C+++ UL+ P+ L++ E---- W+ N+ o? K? w O- M+ V? PS
PE- Y+ PGP+ t- 5- X- R- tv+ b+ DI+++ D G e h+ r-- y--
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
