This is only true on Windows VNC servers. A VNC server on a Unix box has no overhead other than the memory and CPU requirements of the programs run via a VNC session. If VNC server could hook Windows DRI calls, PcAnywhere, TS, and Citrix would go out of business. Greg > It is still > useful over slow links, but it increases the server CPU load > and thus slows > down overall frame rate over a good link. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list to [EMAIL PROTECTED] See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: VNC versus Citrix ICA Severin Olloz
- Re: VNC versus Citrix ICA Jonathan Morton
- Re: VNC versus Citrix ICA Jeff Boerio
- Help: the max workload for the serve... Liqun Xu
- Re: VNC versus Citrix ICA Mac Reiter
- Re: VNC versus Citrix ICA Lee Allen
- Re: VNC versus Citrix ICA David Smith
- Re: VNC versus Citrix ICA Michael Milette
- Re: VNC versus Citrix ICA Jonathan Morton
- RE: VNC versus Citrix ICA Greg Breland
- RE: VNC versus Citrix ICA Greg Breland
- RE: VNC versus Citrix ICA Mac Reiter
- RE: VNC versus Citrix ICA Glenn Mabbutt
- RE: VNC versus Citrix ICA Mac Reiter
- Re: VNC versus Citrix ICA James ''Wez'' Weatherall
- Log file? Gonzalo Palma
- RE: VNC versus Citrix ICA Greg Breland
- RE: VNC versus Citrix ICA Seth Kneller
- RE: VNC versus Citrix ICA Glenn Mabbutt