Hi DRC, It makes sense for tile size to affect performance in a *bandwidth* dependent way, but not for it to affect latency sensitivity. That said, I gather you're working on a project based on the old VNC 3.3.x codebase, so it may well be that there's some I/O scheduling issue in that.
HTH, -- Wez @ RealVNC Ltd > -----Original Message----- > From: DRC [mailto:drcomman...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of DRC > Sent: 07 September 2009 16:06 > To: <james.weather...@realvnc.com> > Cc: <vnc-list@realvnc.com> > Subject: Re: Extensions for fine-grained image quality control > > I'm just reporting what I observed. I don't really know the underlying > reasons behind it, either. I see the same effect with the Tight > protocol. I can't get peak performance out of that protocol with tile > sizes less than 64 kpixels. > > On Sep 7, 2009, at 8:23 AM, "James Weatherall" <j...@realvnc.com> wrote > > I'm not sure I understand why the tile size affects latency- > > sensitivity, unless you're flushing each tile to the TCP stack for > > transmission separately, or something. Can you elaborate? _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list VNC-List@realvnc.com To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
