Dear James
In RHEL3 and RHEL4 they are branching from 4.0.0.beta code. They claim
to be backporting significant issues. I will mention the specific
problems I had to them. If you could tell me where they should look for
the fix made on the modifier + mouse change perhaps they will backport it.
They claim the slighter later version in RHEL4 does have some improvements
with the frame buffer that might (I can't easily test it) have fixed my
refresh problems.
I appreciate this is not a major issue for realvnc as the 4.1.1 does not
show these problems.
Keith Roberts
LeCroy Tech Dev
phone (845) 425 2000 x2228
Fax (845 578 4480
|---------+---------------------------->
| | "James |
| | Weatherall" |
| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>|
| | |
| | 08/11/2005 11:21 |
| | AM |
|---------+---------------------------->
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <vnc-list@realvnc.com>
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: RE: Cadence problem with screen updates
|
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Keith,
As far as I'm aware, RedHat are pretty good at keeping up to date with the
latest VNC releases, at least in their newer Fedora Core releases. If
you're using an older RedHat release, of course, then you may find that
they're no longer updating the VNC package for it.
Cheers,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 August 2005 18:39
> To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
> Subject: RE: Cadence problem with screen updates
>
> I tried a newer version of Cadence (we were using 5.0.33.USR1) and the
> screen refresh problem disappeared but the shift + mouse
> problem remained.
>
> I also then tried your recent release 4.1.1 of the free product
>
> This appears to have fixed the refresh problem for BOTH
> versons of Cadence
> It also fixed the shift+mouse problem as you predicted.
>
> Sounds like Cadence was doing something sloppy and the later
> version of VNC
> (and Exceed) deals with it on the Refreshing front.
>
> Thanks very much
>
> Incidentally what is RealVNCs position on Redhat distribution
> othe realvnc.
> Redhat is usually reasonably proactive with supplying recent
> versions I was
> surprised to
> see they were distributing 4.0.0.beta ware. Is it worth me
> chasing them
> to stay up to date ?
>
> >Keith,
>
> >Please try upgrading to the latest release of VNC
> >(http://www.realvnc.com/download.html) to see if this
> resolves the Cadence
> >rendering problems.
>
> >Regards,
>
> >Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
>
> Keith Roberts
> LeCroy Tech Dev
> _______________________________________________
> VNC-List mailing list
> VNC-List@realvnc.com
> To remove yourself from the list visit:
> http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
_______________________________________________
VNC-List mailing list
VNC-List@realvnc.com
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
