Hi Jerry,
You're wrong about TighVNC. They do support file transfers...
--- "Jerome R. Westrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-05-23 at 13:58, Francesco wrote:
> >  
> >  ciao  jerome io sto bene
> >  thanks a will try on te mailing list o UltraVNC but waht is
> it the
> > tightvnc,  kdevnc and other flavors, you mentioned?
> > francesco
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> There are a lot of diferent projects/people working on VNC.
> 
> I'm not sure I can recite the history from memory, but....
> 
> The original VNC was written by people at a company in
> England.
> They open sourced it.
> Over the years, they provided us with updates and
> improvements.
> But slowly (over years) the project stagnated, but the idea
> was 
> and product where so good that serveral people jumped into the
> 
> breach.
> 
> Of theese split offs, there are 3 that I followed:
> 
> TightVnc (www.tightvnc.com)  
> eSvnc    (defunct)
> ultravnc (www.ultravnc.com)
> 
> Now since the original developement group had stagnated, 
> TightVnc took over as defacto standard for a couple of years.
> 
> Then the original programmers, started a new VNC project
> called RealVNC, and are now actively developing thier project 
> again.
> 
> 
> As to the flavors:
> RealVnc - Both Unix and Windows, defacto standard.
> TightVnc- Both Unix and Windows, used to be mostly Unix
> standard, 
>           now actively improving thier windows side.  These
> are 
>           the people who added Better compresions to improve 
>           performance.
> 
> UltraVNC- Windows only flavor.  Actively pussing the VNC in to
> 
>           the windows arena.  They built special drivers for
> win
>           machines to improve perfomance, and added many
> windows
>           specific features.
> 
>   
> 
> To the best of my knowledge, NO vnc version for unix allows
> file
> transfers, so I assume you have windows on both sides.  If
> both are
> XP then the question arrises. why not use the WIndows Remote
> Desktop
> it is faster than VNC and allows you the share entire drives,
> and
> printers remotetly.  But if have your reason for using VNC
> then
> Ultra is definatetly was the was to go for windows, But...
> 
> ***Some one please correct me if I'm wrong***
> 
> RealVnc is has/was/is impelmenting the UltraDrivers into the
> realVnc Packages?
> 
> 
> Hope this helps....
> 
> Jerry
> _______________________________________________
> VNC-List mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To remove yourself from the list visit:
> http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list



        
                
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Domains  Claim yours for only $14.70/year
http://smallbusiness.promotions.yahoo.com/offer 
_______________________________________________
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list

Reply via email to