Thanks to everyone who replied. The answers have clarified my thinking so I
can see where I went wrong in pondering the problem. I neglected to mention
that the environment behind the firewall is NATed, so I got confused trying
to figure out how the client could forward to an internal address.
Of course, the client does NOT resolve the internal address. Instead, it
forwards the tunnel request to the SSHD daemon behind the firewall and lets
it sort the routing out. And, as William pointed out, all the tunnelling
does take place through port 22 on the firewall so there is no need for
more ports. Just running multiple tunnels, each to a separate machine,
cleanly solves the problem through the one port.
My apologies for wasting bandwidth on my sloppy thinking.
_______________________________________________
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
- Accessing multiple VNC servers using onl... Bruce Atherton
- RE: Accessing multiple VNC servers ... William Hooper
- RE: Accessing multiple VNC serv... Bruce Atherton
- Re: Accessing multiple VNC ... William Hooper
- RE: Accessing multiple VNC serv... Jerry Westrick
- Re: Accessing multiple VNC servers ... Ehud Karni
- RE: Accessing multiple VNC servers ... LUPTAK,MIROSLAV (HP-Slovakia,ex1)
- RE: Accessing multiple VNC serv... Bruce Atherton
- RE: Accessing multiple VNC servers ... Wayne Throop