On Fri, Jan 02, 2026 at 12:47:04PM +0000, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Dec 2025 17:40:33 +0100, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]> 
> said:
> > Reorder struct virtio_gpio_line fields to place the DMA buffers (req/res)
> > last. This eliminates the need for __dma_from_device_aligned_end padding
> > after the DMA buffer, since struct tail padding naturally protects it,
> > making the struct a bit smaller.
> >
> > Size reduction estimation when ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN=128:
> > - request is 8 bytes
> > - response is 2 bytes
> > - removing _end saves up to 128-6=122 bytes padding to align rxlen field
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c | 5 ++---
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c
> > index 32b578b46df8..8b30a94e4625 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c
> > @@ -26,12 +26,11 @@ struct virtio_gpio_line {
> >     struct mutex lock; /* Protects line operation */
> >     struct completion completion;
> >
> > +   unsigned int rxlen;
> > +
> >     __dma_from_device_aligned_begin
> >     struct virtio_gpio_request req;
> >     struct virtio_gpio_response res;
> > -
> > -   __dma_from_device_aligned_end
> > -   unsigned int rxlen;
> >  };
> >
> >  struct vgpio_irq_line {
> > --
> > MST
> >
> >
> 
> Acked-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>

Thanks! There's a new API as suggested by Petr so these patches got changed,
but the same idea. Do you want me to carry your ack or you prefer to
re-review?

-- 
MST


Reply via email to