> From: Lu Baolu <baolu...@linux.intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2024 10:57 PM
>
> @@ -227,7 +233,7 @@ iommufd_hwpt_nested_alloc(struct iommufd_ctx
> *ictx,
> refcount_inc(&parent->common.obj.users);
> hwpt_nested->parent = parent;
>
> - hwpt->domain = ops->domain_alloc_user(idev->dev, flags,
> + hwpt->domain = ops->domain_alloc_user(idev->dev, 0,
> parent->common.domain,
> user_data);
it reads slightly better to clear the fault bit and still pass in flags.
> @@ -308,6 +314,19 @@ int iommufd_hwpt_alloc(struct iommufd_ucmd
> *ucmd)
> goto out_put_pt;
> }
>
> + if (cmd->flags & IOMMU_HWPT_FAULT_ID_VALID) {
> + struct iommufd_fault *fault;
> +
> + fault = iommufd_get_fault(ucmd, cmd->fault_id);
> + if (IS_ERR(fault)) {
> + rc = PTR_ERR(fault);
> + goto out_hwpt;
> + }
> + hwpt->fault = fault;
> + hwpt->domain->iopf_handler = iommufd_fault_iopf_handler;
> + hwpt->domain->fault_data = hwpt;
> + }
this is nesting specific. why not moving it to the nested_alloc()?
