On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 01:11:46PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
This replaces use of skbuff state to calculate new 'rx_bytes'/'fwd_cnt'
values with explicit value as input argument. This makes code more
simple, because it is not needed to change skbuff state before each
call to update 'rx_bytes'/'fwd_cnt'.
I think we should also describe the issues you found that we are fixinig
now, for example the wrong calculation in virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt().
Something like this:
`skb->len` can vary when we partially read the data, this complicates
the calculation of credit to be updated in
virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt()/virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt().
Also in virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt() we were miscalculating the
credit since `skb->len` was redundant.
For these reasons, let's replace the use ...
(continue with what is written in this commit message)
And we should add the Fixes tag:
Fixes: 71dc9ec9ac7d ("virtio/vsock: replace virtio_vsock_pkt with sk_buff")
Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <[email protected]>
---
net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
index a1581c77cf84..618680fd9906 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
@@ -241,21 +241,18 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct
vsock_sock *vsk,
}
static bool virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs,
- struct sk_buff *skb)
+ u32 len)
{
- if (vvs->rx_bytes + skb->len > vvs->buf_alloc)
+ if (vvs->rx_bytes + len > vvs->buf_alloc)
return false;
- vvs->rx_bytes += skb->len;
+ vvs->rx_bytes += len;
return true;
}
static void virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs,
- struct sk_buff *skb)
+ u32 len)
{
- int len;
-
- len = skb_headroom(skb) - sizeof(struct virtio_vsock_hdr) - skb->len;
vvs->rx_bytes -= len;
vvs->fwd_cnt += len;
}
@@ -388,7 +385,9 @@ virtio_transport_stream_do_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
skb_pull(skb, bytes);
if (skb->len == 0) {
- virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(vvs, skb);
+ u32 pkt_len = le32_to_cpu(virtio_vsock_hdr(skb)->len);
Good catch! In my proposal I used `bytes` wrongly!
The rest LGTM!
Stefano
+
+ virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(vvs, pkt_len);
consume_skb(skb);
} else {
__skb_queue_head(&vvs->rx_queue, skb);
@@ -437,17 +436,17 @@ static int virtio_transport_seqpacket_do_dequeue(struct
vsock_sock *vsk,
while (!msg_ready) {
struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr;
+ size_t pkt_len;
skb = __skb_dequeue(&vvs->rx_queue);
if (!skb)
break;
hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
+ pkt_len = (size_t)le32_to_cpu(hdr->len);
if (dequeued_len >= 0) {
- size_t pkt_len;
size_t bytes_to_copy;
- pkt_len = (size_t)le32_to_cpu(hdr->len);
bytes_to_copy = min(user_buf_len, pkt_len);
if (bytes_to_copy) {
@@ -484,7 +483,7 @@ static int virtio_transport_seqpacket_do_dequeue(struct
vsock_sock *vsk,
msg->msg_flags |= MSG_EOR;
}
- virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(vvs, skb);
+ virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(vvs, pkt_len);
kfree_skb(skb);
}
@@ -1040,7 +1039,7 @@ virtio_transport_recv_enqueue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
- can_enqueue = virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt(vvs, skb);
+ can_enqueue = virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt(vvs, len);
if (!can_enqueue) {
free_pkt = true;
goto out;
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
