I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the 
corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c 
b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
index d9a9058..f7d2262 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
 static bool force_legacy = false;
 
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LEGACY)
-module_param(force_legacy, bool, 0444);
+module_param(force_legacy, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(force_legacy,
                 "Force legacy mode for transitional virtio 1 devices");
 #endif
-- 
2.9.2

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to