Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> My preference is ring proxying. Not we'll need ring proxying (or at >> least event proxying) for non-MSI guests. >> > > Exactly, that's what I meant earlier. That's enough, isn't it, Anthony? >
It is if we have a working implementation that demonstrates the userspace interface is sufficient. Once it goes into the upstream kernel, we need to have backwards compatibility code in QEMU forever to support that kernel version. Regards, Anthony Liguori _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
