Avi Kivity wrote: > On 06/15/2009 04:23 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > How would qemu know which slots to optimize for? > > In practice, I don't see that as a real problem. We should (a) add an > ioapic and four more pci links (b) recommend that slots be assigned in > ascending order, and everything works. > > I don't see your concern about libvirt allocating slots. If a human > can plug a card into a slot, so can libvirt. Doing an interactive > back-and-forth (equivalent to plugging a card while blindfolded, then > looking to see which slot we hit) is certainly more difficult.
Let's take a concrete example because I think you missed my point. For the r2d board, if you have 1 on-board NIC, it has to go in slot 2. Additional NICs can go in any slot, but the primary on-board NIC is expected to live in slot 2. It's possible to not have that on-board NIC. If you let QEMU allocate which PCI slot a device goes in, we can hide this detail from libvirt. If you have libvirt do PCI slot allocation by default, it has to know about this restriction in the r2d board unless you have a clever way to express this sort of information. Once QEMU has allocated a device to a slot, libvirt can do a good job maintaining that relationship. Regards, Anthony Liguori _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
