Am Donnerstag, 29. Mai 2008 schrieb Jens Axboe: > > > Just that u64 seems like overkill: u32? > > > > Definitely, u32 would be just fine, u64 is way overkill :-) > > Even u16 would work, the block layer doesn't use more than an unsigned > short for storing hardware sector size anyway.
Thanks, good to know. Do you think, that could change in the future? The virtio definition is going to be a public interface, so if there is a chance that u16 is not enough in the future I would respin the patch with u32, otherwise u16. Christian _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
