On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 12:54:53PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote: > > > > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]> > > Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2023 3:15 AM > > > > It's not conformant to that statement then :( It's a SHOULD which means if > > you > > know exactly what you are doing, there could be exceptions. > > In this case it's a SHOULD because it was added after 1.0 and we did not > > find a > > way to negotiate this requirement since it's the feature negotiation itself. > > True. May be in future such device can update the revision id.
You can already change it but that doesn't imply anything at all, in 1.0 revisions are vendor specific. -- MST --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
