On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 07:46:21AM +0200, Parav Pandit wrote:
> 1. Currently, virtqueue is identified between driver and device
> interchangeably using either number of index terminology.
>
> 2. Between PCI and MMIO transport the queue size (depth) is
> defined as queue_size and QueueNum respectively.
>
> To avoid confusion and to have consistency, unify them to use as Number.
>
> Solution:
> Use virtqueue number description, and rename MMIO register as QueueSize.
>
> Patch summary:
> patch-1 renames index to number for pci transport
> patch-2 renames mmio register from Num to Size
> patch-3 renames index to number for mmio transport
>
> Please review.
> This series fixes the issue [1].
>
> This series is on top of [2].
>
> [1] https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/163
> [2] https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-dev/202302/msg00527.html
What about RSS description in net? That says:
description.tex:Field \field{unclassified_queue} contains the 0-based index of
is the index same as vq number? or something different?
> ---
> Cornelia:
> I was not sure about ccw for vq_config_block and vq_info_block structures
> index field refers to the queue number or not.
> Can you please clarify?
>
> If it vqn, I will send v1 by replacing index to vqn to be
> consistent with other part of the spec which also uses vqn.
>
> Parav Pandit (3):
> transport-pci: Refer to the vq by its number
> transport-mmio: Rename QueueNum register
> transport-mmio: Refer to the vq by its number
>
> transport-mmio.tex | 16 ++++++++--------
> transport-pci.tex | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.26.2
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
