Hi Benjamin! On Do, 17 Mai 2012, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2012, Christian Brabandt wrote: > > >Hi Benjamin! > > > >On Do, 17 Mai 2012, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote: > > > >>If encoding conversion is necessary for the write, there are two > >>passes through the buffer: > >> > >>First pass: for every character in the buffer, ensure that it > >>can be converted to the target encoding. (This is in memory, so > >>it's not as time-consuming as a full "practice write" to disk.) > >> > >>Second pass: write the file to disk, using the target encoding > >>(converting on-the-fly, or however the current process works). > > > >That is what my patch does. > > The updated one? Or did I misinterpret the test results from this > thread? It sounded as though the change doubled the time it would > take to write a large file. Both did. I was also surprised, that just converting the buffer content without writing almost doubled the write speed. The updated one just kicked in, when no backup was done. regards, Christian -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
