Hi Christian,
   For some reason :q! doesn't work for me. I tried the :cq that Gary &
Taylor suggested, and it
worked perfectly.
   It looks like I can also delete the lines, then save the buffer with :wq
and that works too.
You're right-it looks like bash just executes the file with the timestamp
changes, so if I
save a blank file, then nothing happens.
   There's a lot you can do on the command line with "set -o vi",
but sometimes it's nice to just be able to go into vim and be able to edit
there, using
buffers, etc.
   For now, I think I'll stick with :cq. Thanks for the advice everybody!

-Ven

On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Christian Brabandt <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi Ven!
>
> On Fr, 23 Mär 2012, Ven Tadipatri wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >    This may sound like a real newbie question, but when I do the "set -o
> > vi"
> > in the bash command line shell, if I hit <Esc> and v on the command line,
> > it goes into vi editing mode. This is kind of cool, as I can exercise
> > the full editing power of vi, and when I exit the editor it runs the
> > command.
> >   Unfortunately, sometimes I may have a really
> > powerful/dangerous/unnecessary
> > command that I've typed, and all I want to do is just cancel, not execute
> > the
> > command. How do I do this?
> >   :q! doesn't seem to work, as the command still runs. :wq , well, I
> don't
> > want
> > to save anything, I just want to get out of the editor and return to the
>
> Actually, :q! should work and always did for me.
> I would guess, that bash only executes the file, if it's timestamp has
> been changed. May be some plugin that sets an WriteCmd autocmd or
> something?
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
> Christian
> --
> Wie man sein Kind nicht nennen sollte:
>  Don Erstag
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

Reply via email to