> Wel already do use :argadd actually, when starting with "vim file1 > file2". The first buffer is wiped out, we just don't have buffer number > one.
I think this is not true if 'hidden' is set. I failed to include that in my example though. Sorry for being unclear there. With 'hidden' the buffer hangs around. > In that case it's obvious the order will change. I think we only need > to care about saving a session, exit and opening Vim with the same > session. It should be functionally in the same state then. This sounds perfect going forward. Makes good sense to me. Thanks, Jason -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/CAG%3DmhmM4O-x0E%2BFv%2BetHULPcATcrXt6JkH2ND401BuC27QKM0Q%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
