Hi,
On my Mac, I've been unable to install vim due to a failure of test55 coming
with Patch 7.4.341.
To be more specific, the failure is relevant to lines 335--336 of test55.in,
and the comparison of test55.failed I got with test55.ok is
$ diff test55.failed test55.ok
104c104
< [-1, [], {}, 'FOOBAR', 'foo', 0, 0, 1.0e-15, 0.22, 7, 9, 12, 18, 22, 255]
---
> [-1, 0, 0, 'foo', 'FOOBAR', {}, [], 1.0e-15, 0.22, 7, 9, 12, 18, 22, 255]
But... It looks the Mac just gave one of possible correct results, doesn't it?
Or, is there an undocumented criterion that determines a unique sorting order
among such elements that have the same strtod()-oriented precedence?
Regards,
Kazunobu Kuriyama
On Jun 26, 2014, at 0:31, Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Patch 7.4.341
> Problem: sort() doesn't handle numbers well.
> Solution: Add an argument to specify sorting on numbers. (Christian
> Brabandt)
> Files: runtime/doc/eval.txt, src/eval.c, src/testdir/test55.in,
> src/testdir/test55.ok
>
>
> *** ../vim-7.4.340/runtime/doc/eval.txt 2014-06-25 14:39:35.094348583
> +0200
> --- runtime/doc/eval.txt 2014-06-25 17:05:50.606680574 +0200
> ***************
> *** 5618,5628 ****
>
> If you want a list to remain unmodified make a copy first: >
> :let sortedlist = sort(copy(mylist))
> - < Uses the string representation of each item to sort on.
> - Numbers sort after Strings, |Lists| after Numbers.
> - For sorting text in the current buffer use |:sort|.
>
> ! When {func} is given and it is one then case is ignored.
> When {func} is a |Funcref| or a function name, this function
> is called to compare items. The function is invoked with two
> items as argument and must return zero if they are equal, 1 or
> --- 5628,5647 ----
>
> If you want a list to remain unmodified make a copy first: >
> :let sortedlist = sort(copy(mylist))
>
> ! < When {func} is omitted, is empty or zero, then sort() uses the
> ! string representation of each item to sort on. Numbers sort
> ! after Strings, |Lists| after Numbers. For sorting text in the
> ! current buffer use |:sort|.
> !
> ! When {func} is given and it is is '1' or 'i' then case is
> ! ignored.
> !
> ! When {func} is given and it is 'n' then all items will be
> ! sorted numerical (Implementation detail: This uses the
> ! strtod() function to parse numbers, Strings, Lists, Dicts and
> ! Funcrefs will be considered as being 0).
> !
> When {func} is a |Funcref| or a function name, this function
> is called to compare items. The function is invoked with two
> items as argument and must return zero if they are equal, 1 or
> *** ../vim-7.4.340/src/eval.c 2014-06-17 17:48:21.776628008 +0200
> --- src/eval.c 2014-06-25 17:23:05.466719724 +0200
> ***************
> *** 17330,17335 ****
> --- 17330,17336 ----
> item_compare2 __ARGS((const void *s1, const void *s2));
>
> static int item_compare_ic;
> + static int item_compare_numeric;
> static char_u *item_compare_func;
> static dict_T *item_compare_selfdict;
> static int item_compare_func_err;
> ***************
> *** 17359,17368 ****
> p1 = (char_u *)"";
> if (p2 == NULL)
> p2 = (char_u *)"";
> ! if (item_compare_ic)
> ! res = STRICMP(p1, p2);
> else
> ! res = STRCMP(p1, p2);
> vim_free(tofree1);
> vim_free(tofree2);
> return res;
> --- 17360,17379 ----
> p1 = (char_u *)"";
> if (p2 == NULL)
> p2 = (char_u *)"";
> ! if (!item_compare_numeric)
> ! {
> ! if (item_compare_ic)
> ! res = STRICMP(p1, p2);
> ! else
> ! res = STRCMP(p1, p2);
> ! }
> else
> ! {
> ! double n1, n2;
> ! n1 = strtod((char *)p1, (char **)&p1);
> ! n2 = strtod((char *)p2, (char **)&p2);
> ! res = n1 == n2 ? 0 : n1 > n2 ? 1 : -1;
> ! }
> vim_free(tofree1);
> vim_free(tofree2);
> return res;
> ***************
> *** 17439,17444 ****
> --- 17450,17456 ----
> return; /* short list sorts pretty quickly */
>
> item_compare_ic = FALSE;
> + item_compare_numeric = FALSE;
> item_compare_func = NULL;
> item_compare_selfdict = NULL;
> if (argvars[1].v_type != VAR_UNKNOWN)
> ***************
> *** 17457,17462 ****
> --- 17469,17487 ----
> item_compare_ic = TRUE;
> else
> item_compare_func = get_tv_string(&argvars[1]);
> + if (item_compare_func != NULL)
> + {
> + if (STRCMP(item_compare_func, "n") == 0)
> + {
> + item_compare_func = NULL;
> + item_compare_numeric = TRUE;
> + }
> + else if (STRCMP(item_compare_func, "i") == 0)
> + {
> + item_compare_func = NULL;
> + item_compare_ic = TRUE;
> + }
> + }
> }
>
> if (argvars[2].v_type != VAR_UNKNOWN)
> *** ../vim-7.4.340/src/testdir/test55.in 2014-03-25 18:23:27.062087691
> +0100
> --- src/testdir/test55.in 2014-06-25 17:20:47.006714486 +0200
> ***************
> *** 332,337 ****
> --- 332,342 ----
> :$put =string(reverse(sort(l)))
> :$put =string(sort(reverse(sort(l))))
> :$put =string(uniq(sort(l)))
> + :let l=[7, 9, 18, 12, 22, 10.0e-16, -1, 0xff, 0, -0, 0.22, 'foo',
> 'FOOBAR',{}, []]
> + :$put =string(sort(copy(l), 'n'))
> + :$put =string(sort(copy(l), 1))
> + :$put =string(sort(copy(l), 'i'))
> + :$put =string(sort(copy(l)))
> :"
> :" splitting a string to a List
> :$put =string(split(' aa bb '))
> *** ../vim-7.4.340/src/testdir/test55.ok 2014-03-25 18:23:27.062087691
> +0100
> --- src/testdir/test55.ok 2014-06-25 17:23:31.382720704 +0200
> ***************
> *** 101,106 ****
> --- 101,110 ----
> [[0, 1, 2], [0, 1, 2], 4, 2, 2, 1.5, 'xaaa', 'x8', 'foo6', 'foo', 'foo',
> 'A11', '-0']
> ['-0', 'A11', 'foo', 'foo', 'foo6', 'x8', 'xaaa', 1.5, 2, 2, 4, [0, 1, 2],
> [0, 1, 2]]
> ['-0', 'A11', 'foo', 'foo6', 'x8', 'xaaa', 1.5, 2, 4, [0, 1, 2]]
> + [-1, 0, 0, 'foo', 'FOOBAR', {}, [], 1.0e-15, 0.22, 7, 9, 12, 18, 22, 255]
> + ['foo', 'FOOBAR', -1, 0, 0, 0.22, 1.0e-15, 12, 18, 22, 255, 7, 9, [], {}]
> + ['foo', 'FOOBAR', -1, 0, 0, 0.22, 1.0e-15, 12, 18, 22, 255, 7, 9, [], {}]
> + ['FOOBAR', 'foo', -1, 0, 0, 0.22, 1.0e-15, 12, 18, 22, 255, 7, 9, [], {}]
> ['aa', 'bb']
> ['aa', 'bb']
> ['', 'aa', 'bb', '']
> *** ../vim-7.4.340/src/version.c 2014-06-25 15:02:29.250400570 +0200
> --- src/version.c 2014-06-25 16:46:45.438637250 +0200
> ***************
> *** 736,737 ****
> --- 736,739 ----
> { /* Add new patch number below this line */
> + /**/
> + 341,
> /**/
>
> --
> We do not stumble over mountains, but over molehills.
> Confucius
>
> /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
> /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
> \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
> \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
>
> --
> --
> You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
> Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
> For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "vim_dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.