Charles Peacech wrote:
> Is it possible to add a pumselected() function to vim? I have a patch
> but I'm not sure my implementation is correct, it works though.
>
> Here's why it is required. Suppose I want to map <CR> like this
> 1) when popup is displayed but no item is selected, I want the popup
> to close and <CR> is inserted
> 2) when popup is displayed and an item is selected, I want the item to
> be inserted but no <CR> is inserted
> 3) when no popup is displayed I want <CR> to be inserted
>
> Currently AFAIK no. 2 is not possible, that's why a pumselected()
> function is required.
>
> I simply implement it as
>
> int
> pum_is_selected()
> {
> return pum_selected != -1;
> }
>
> and then add pumselected() to the functions table.
Well, it's possible, but it's likely that others will then ask for the
index. So it's better to return the pum_selected value.
But why stop there? Might also want to return the list of items.
--
If cars evolved at the same rate as computers have, they'd cost five euro,
run for a year on a couple of liters of petrol, and explode once a day.
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
