Glts wrote: > On Sunday, June 2, 2013 9:30:20 PM UTC+2, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Christian Brabandt wrote: > > > > > Note, that latest patch I sent, does not require an extra option, is > > > rather small, makes the code much more readable (imho) and we can even > > > get rid of test89. > > > > You mean the patch you sent on May 30? > > I don't see anybody responding that they like that solution. > > This is exactly one of the reasons people are calling for a proper issue > tracker on BitBucket or similar. I remember reading one dismissive and > three favourable reactions to this idea either on vim_dev or on vim_use. > On an issue tracker these would have been impossible to overlook. > > I proposed this originally but I'm still undecided. I think it would be > good to hear a few more voices.
There already is an issue tracker. -- hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict: 54. You start tilting your head sideways to smile. :-) /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
