Bram,
gcc complains when compiling latest Vim version (7.3.1090) with
In file included from regexp.c:7864:0:
regexp_nfa.c: In function 'nfa_regpiece':
regexp_nfa.c:1390:19: warning: declaration of 'new_state' shadows a global 
declaration [-Wshadow]
regexp_nfa.c:270:21: warning: shadowed declaration is here [-Wshadow]
regexp_nfa.c: In function 'nfa_regtry':
regexp_nfa.c:4727:7: warning: declaration of 'i' shadows a previous local 
[-Wshadow]
regexp_nfa.c:4638:10: warning: shadowed declaration is here [-Wshadow]


Attached patch fixes it.

regards,
Christian
-- 
Die Voraussetzung für einen freien Staat ist ein Maximun an
Öffentlichkeit.
                -- Karl Jaspers

-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


diff --git a/src/regexp_nfa.c b/src/regexp_nfa.c
--- a/src/regexp_nfa.c
+++ b/src/regexp_nfa.c
@@ -1387,7 +1387,7 @@
     long	minval, maxval;
     int		greedy = TRUE;      /* Braces are prefixed with '-' ? */
     parse_state_T old_state;
-    parse_state_T new_state;
+    parse_state_T c_new_state;
     int		c2;
     int		old_post_pos;
     int		my_post_start;
@@ -1527,7 +1527,7 @@
 	    /* Ignore previous call to nfa_regatom() */
 	    post_ptr = post_start + my_post_start;
 	    /* Save parse state after the repeated atom and the \{} */
-	    save_parse_state(&new_state);
+	    save_parse_state(&c_new_state);
 
 	    quest = (greedy == TRUE? NFA_QUEST : NFA_QUEST_NONGREEDY);
 	    for (i = 0; i < maxval; i++)
@@ -1557,7 +1557,7 @@
 	    }
 
 	    /* Go to just after the repeated atom and the \{} */
-	    restore_parse_state(&new_state);
+	    restore_parse_state(&c_new_state);
 	    curchr = -1;
 
 	    break;
@@ -4724,29 +4724,29 @@
 
     if (prog->reghasz == REX_SET)
     {
-	int		i;
+	int		j;
 
 	cleanup_zsubexpr();
 	re_extmatch_out = make_extmatch();
-	for (i = 0; i < subs.synt.in_use; i++)
+	for (j = 0; j < subs.synt.in_use; j++)
 	{
 	    if (REG_MULTI)
 	    {
-		struct multipos *mpos = &subs.synt.list.multi[i];
+		struct multipos *mpos = &subs.synt.list.multi[j];
 
 		/* Only accept single line matches. */
 		if (mpos->start.lnum >= 0 && mpos->start.lnum == mpos->end.lnum)
-		    re_extmatch_out->matches[i] =
+		    re_extmatch_out->matches[j] =
 			vim_strnsave(reg_getline(mpos->start.lnum)
 							    + mpos->start.col,
 					     mpos->end.col - mpos->start.col);
 	    }
 	    else
 	    {
-		struct linepos *lpos = &subs.synt.list.line[i];
+		struct linepos *lpos = &subs.synt.list.line[j];
 
 		if (lpos->start != NULL && lpos->end != NULL)
-		    re_extmatch_out->matches[i] =
+		    re_extmatch_out->matches[j] =
 			    vim_strnsave(lpos->start,
 					      (int)(lpos->end - lpos->start));
 	    }

Raspunde prin e-mail lui