Hi Bram,
> It was there intentionally. Does it cause a problem anywhere?
Oh, not at all. But it seemed inconsistent because ":h +feature-list"
lists the feature as "+fork", but :version shows "+fork()".
That could mislead people to use code like "has('fork()')".
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
