Simon Ruderich wrote:
> Thanks for the hint. Attached is a testcase which ports my old
> tests to use your suggestion.
>
> I noticed that screencol()/screenrow() start from zero while the
> other *col() functions start from one. Should I update my
> screencol()/screenrow() patch?
Yes, it would be nice to keep this consistent. virtcol() also returns 1
for the first column.
--
ARTHUR: I did say sorry about the `old woman,' but from the behind you
looked--
DENNIS: What I object to is you automatically treat me like an inferior!
ARTHUR: Well, I AM king...
The Quest for the Holy Grail (Monty Python)
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
