On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:52:45AM +0200, Ingo Karkat wrote: > On 29-Mar-2012 15:41:02 -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > On 2012-03-29, Christian Brabandt wrote: > >> [14 lines deleted] > >> The help for 'cursorline' says: > >> > >> ,---- > >> | Highlight the screen line of the cursor with CursorLine > >> `---- > >> > >> While 'cul' has always been highlighting complete lines. Do you think, > >> this would warrant a new option, that changes 'cul' to only highlight > >> screen lines or change the option 'cul' to a string option, that can be > >> set to 'screen' or 'line'? > >> > >> This might be helpful for long lines (e.g. when editing csv files and > >> wrap is set). > >> > >> If not, the documentation should be updated. > > > > Or declare it a bug and fix the behavior to match the documentation. > While I see value in the proposed change, I prefer to keep the old behavior, > too. It subtly reminds me that I'm editing a long physical line with 'wrap' > on, > and helps me in choosing j/k or gj/gk for navigation. Since this hasn't been > brought up since 'cursorline's introduction in Vim 7.0, I guess that the > majority doesn't object to the current behavior, neither. i'm +1 liking the current behavior too, ingo i'd like to at least keep it as an option sc -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
