On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 21:19:15 +0000
"Haynal, Steve" <steve_hay...@mentor.com> wrote:

> Hi Ard,
> 
> Yes, I noted that message in my first e-mail too. I may be able to reduce the 
> size of the region to something that will work on aarch64. But even for 
> another device that has a single small (16kB) memory region, that region 
> shows up as disabled in lspci on aarch64 but not so on x86. There are no 
> drivers in either case. Any ideas on why it shows up as disabled on aarch64?
> 


This was in your original post:

x86:
00:09.0 Memory controller: Xilinx Corporation Device 7022
               Subsystem: Xilinx Corporation Device 0007
               Physical Slot: 9
               Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- 
ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- DisINTx-
               Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- 
<TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
               Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 10
               Region 0: Memory at e0071000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
               Region 1: Memory at c0000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) 
[size=512M]

aarch64:
00:09.0 Memory controller: Xilinx Corporation Device 7022
               Subsystem: Xilinx Corporation Device 0007
               Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- 
ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
               Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- 
<TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
               Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 47
               Region 0: Memory at 10000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) 
[disabled] [size=4K]
               Region 1: Memory at <ignored> (32-bit, non-prefetchable) 
[disabled]

Note the Mem- vs Mem+.  If you flip that with setpci (setpci -s 00:09.0
COMMAND=2:2), it'll show at least BAR0 as enabled.  Maybe it was left
disabled since not all the resources were allocated.

_______________________________________________
vfio-users mailing list
vfio-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/vfio-users

Reply via email to